You are here: eircom.net homepage » entertainment » rent dvds
  advanced search
advanced search
eircom.net DVD

28 Weeks Later (2007)
There is currently no trailer available for this title

This content requires the
Adobe Flash Player Version 8 or greater.
Click Here to download the latest version.

Movie details
Rent '28 Weeks Later' today

No votes registered. Please log in to vote
Director:Juan Carlos Fresnadillo
Starring:Robert Carlyle | Rose Byrne | Jeremy Renner | Harold Perrineau | Catherine McCormack | Iris Elba | Imogen Poots
Genres:Horror
Languages:English
Synopsis:Six months after the rage virus has annihilated the British Isles, the US Army declares that the war against infection has been won, and that the reconstruction of the country can begin. In the first wave of returning refugees, a family is reunited - but one of them unwittingly carries a terrible secret. The virus is not yet dead, and this time, it is more dangerous than ever.


Customer Review
Good 30 out of 100
If you liked 28 days later, then you'll enjoy this too.
Todd from Dublin , 29 Jan 2011
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

Awful film! 5 out of 100
Shouldn't have been made, shouldn't have been watched. This sequel to the very good horror 28 Days Later is unimaginative, ugly, and lacks any redeeming feature. Bad things happen to good people, and nobody is saved. Full stop. Of course, I should have known when I saw that Robert Carlyle is in it. He isn't exactly top of the pile.
Donal from Cork , 29 Aug 2010
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

+ 40 out of 100
I liked this but I loved the first movie. Great zombies as in the original. I guess I'm just a fan and wanted a sequel.
Fergus from Galway , 01 Dec 2009
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

i really liked this 45 out of 100
i really liked and enjoyed this - i do like zombie flicks though. They kept it suspenseful and they took risks making it so graphic and gorey but it worked. You really can get into the story.
Petra from Dublin , 01 Sep 2009
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

not bad but not good! 30 out of 100
Not too bad but I found the ending unsatisfactory and there was a bit too much blood and gore just for the sake of it. Also, some of the story didn’t seem well enough thought out. Now where near as good as the first film and with a bit more thought it could have been.
Nuala from Dublin , 28 Aug 2009
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

28 Weeks Later 0 out of 10
Very disappointing sequel - really enjoyed 28 Days Later - lets hope they don't attempt 28 Months Later!!!
Joanne from Wicklow , 26 Jan 2009
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

28 Weeks Later 35 out of 100
Great Action film
Stephen from Laois , 02 Jan 2009
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

28 Weeks later 20 out of 100
couldn't see the point in making this movie.
Hugh from Wicklow , 24 Nov 2008
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

28 Weeks Later 25 out of 100
This film was ok but it got to the stage durning the film I was actually getting bored,it is typical Zombie type movie yet again the end is so typical, just let it have an ending and leave it at that.
Tracey from Meath , 21 Oct 2008
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

London is gone to the (isle of) dogs 30 out of 100
If you liked the first one you'll probably enjoy this as its more of the same and is not a film about repopulating the UK. Quite a lot of gore.
Rónán from Dublin , 21 Sep 2008
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

Disapointing 15 out of 100
I'm not normally a fan of this genre but I enjoyed 28 days so was looking foward to this. It was highly disapointing. It follows a different set of, shallow, characters and has gaping plot holes which really take away from any possibility of suspending disbelief in order to enjoy the film!
Claire from Dublin , 04 Sep 2008
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

28 Weeks Later 30 out of 100
Good zombie show. Plenty of action and gore. Worth a watch.
William from Dublin , 05 Aug 2008
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

Good flick 35 out of 100
Good pop corn film. Not as good as the 1st one though.
Declan from Galway , 23 Jul 2008
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

28 Weeks Later 15 out of 100
Better than the first one. Definitley alot more gory and cringhy but the story line improved from 28 days later. Definitley dont watch if your a quesy person.
Tina from Dublin , 10 Jul 2008
0 people out of 1 found this review helpful

good stuff 35 out of 100
very frightening
michelle from Sligo , 02 Jul 2008
1 people out of 1 found this review helpful

? 15 out of 100
Saw 30 days of night and thought it was better horror, this I didn't even watch all of it!
James from Tipperary , 01 Jul 2008
0 people out of 1 found this review helpful

28 Weeks Later 35 out of 100
Bit too much blood & guts for me but overall a good movie and quite believable - a kind of modern day zombie type movie. If you like gore then go for this!
Sandra from Dublin , 18 Jun 2008
1 people out of 1 found this review helpful

28 Weeks Later 30 out of 100
Still think 28 Days Later is the best of the genre so far, and this is a good, but not quite good enough, sequel. Robert Carlisle is excellent as always, and provides all the movie highlights. Everything else, hmm, so so. This is what happens when the Americans move in on a good thing...
KIM from Louth , 17 Jun 2008
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

'28 Weeks Later' 50 out of 100
'28 Weeks Later' is a very good movie i love it
Natalie from Meath , 14 Jun 2008
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

28 WEEKS LATER 10 out of 100
Plenty of gore and fast moving screen images. We are all doomed . Film not up to much
Donal from Dublin , 29 May 2008
1 people out of 1 found this review helpful

Good sequel. 30 out of 100
Not as good as the first one but is a good sequel. Its just a shame it was Americanised.
John from Dublin , 23 May 2008
1 people out of 1 found this review helpful

Boring 25 out of 100
No as good as the first movie I'm afraid however I didn't fall asleep ...
Joseph from Dublin , 09 May 2008
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

28 weeks later 35 out of 100
Excellent. Even though this does sound like another silly, far fetched movie where everyone is killed by zombies it is excellent. While the plot is very inbelieveable and the ending predictable I would still recommend this as a good 'zone out on a friday night with a pizza' kind of dvd, no effort needed.
caroline from Wexford , 08 May 2008
0 people out of 1 found this review helpful

Good sequel 35 out of 100
Not as good as the original, but a good sequel. Robert Carlyle is good.
John from Meath , 29 Apr 2008
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

Nasty! 10 out of 100
This film is a video nasty! Not a patch on 28 Days later. Rubbish!
Gerry from Dublin , 10 Apr 2008
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

28 Weeks Later 15 out of 100
Anyone who is hoping for another '28 Days Later' will be sorely disappointed by this movie. It did not even hold my attention, never mind thrill/scare/have me on the edge of my seat! Acting was pretty good, it was filmed quite qell, but the storyline let everyone down.
Jennifer from Galway , 10 Apr 2008
1 people out of 1 found this review helpful

Good 35 out of 100
Pretty much the same as the first one so that kinda lets it down. But I enjoyed and a few scary moments.
Aishling from Longford , 04 Apr 2008
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

worthless 15 out of 100
shouldn't have been made. stupid film
Edward from Dublin , 20 Mar 2008
1 people out of 1 found this review helpful

average to lower quality sequel to 28 days 20 out of 100
Hmm, nice for fans of the Genre, but other than that, not worth to rent
Thorsten from Cork , 13 Mar 2008
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

Bore Gore fest 10 out of 100
28 minutes later I totally forgot what the point of this film was. Nowhere near as gripping as the first. The over used images of empty steets just don't do it anymore. I must hand it to them on the vileness of their zombies though.
alison from Dublin , 06 Mar 2008
1 people out of 1 found this review helpful

'28 Weeks Later' 45 out of 100
Very good film i think its better then the first one
Gerard from Kerry , 05 Mar 2008
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

28 Weeks Later 35 out of 100
Not bad as a sequal, much better than I expected. Although there are the 'What are you doing that for, stupid' Moments.
Elaine from Cork , 25 Feb 2008
1 people out of 1 found this review helpful

Shocking and memorable 35 out of 100
Very different from the first quiet, suspenseful movie, 'Weeks' should be called 'one day later' focusing as it does on a safe 'green' zone in London and the discovery of a latent carrier of the rage virus who could be the source of a cure. The the re-explosion of the virus into a confined, crowded space is predictable, but the shocking, violent manner of its re-emergence is not, as the city explodes in slaughter. We are cleverly and cruelly made to feel for the characters too - nightmare stuff.
John from Dublin , 24 Feb 2008
2 people out of 5 found this review helpful

excellant 50 out of 100
must see, brilliant, better than first
ronan from Meath , 20 Feb 2008
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

Made for TV? 30 out of 100
Hmmm. Passable but very 1970s TV film
Mark from Dublin , 18 Feb 2008
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

Not bad 35 out of 100
As sequels go this is not bad but the thing I think they should have concentrated more on which worked so effectively on the original is the shots of empty London granted there is some of this but it does not have the same visual effects and once again like in Reign of fire the Yanks are the saviours of the day, hmmm recommended but could have been better.
Mark from Dublin , 14 Feb 2008
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

28 Weeks Later 50 out of 100
Absolutly brialliant film, much better that 28 days later!! Leaves you on the edge of your seat
Elaine from Meath , 13 Feb 2008
1 people out of 2 found this review helpful

very good 35 out of 100
really enjoyed this film. didnt think much of 28 days later but this one was really good much more action and much better stiry. definitely worth watching for fans of horror.
Martin from Kildare , 27 Jan 2008
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

28 weeks later 40 out of 100
I enjoyed the first one (28 days later) and the seqal certinaly didnt dissapoint. From the opening scene right till the end its a scare fest.
Martin from Wicklow , 08 Jan 2008
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

Poor follow up 15 out of 100
Not a patch on the first
Garry from Louth , 12 Dec 2007
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

Its a zombie movie...not high art... 40 out of 100
okay,you know what this is like so be prepared.its a bit overly gory in places but i found it a good sequel to the original. there is something horrific about zombies that can run fast!Robert Carlyle is peculiar here but IMHO he is one of the most underrated actors today & the initial scene of him shows how good he is . Some of the story are a little weak, but then again as i said this isnt an arty movie so dont go looking for deeper meaning here. if you like zomebie movies, you will like this
Tom from Wicklow , 12 Dec 2007
1 people out of 2 found this review helpful

28 40 out of 100
I liked this, i thought it was a very good sequel, some great scenes in it, hard to see whats goin on early on but its grand then.
Stephen from Kildare , 06 Dec 2007
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

Rotten 0 out of 10
This is the most disgusting film that I have seen in a long time. Extremly gorey and violent and an awful lot of this was uncalled for. I wouldn't waste my time renting this if I were you!
Pamela from Dublin , 28 Nov 2007
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

28 weeks later 15 out of 100
Underwhelming sequel. Same zombies, this time with Yanks.
Aidan from Dublin , 19 Nov 2007
3 people out of 3 found this review helpful

28 Weeks Later 10 out of 100
First one was much better. sequel for the sake of it.
Andrew from Meath , 19 Nov 2007
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

Dismal Sequel 10 out of 100
Apart from the first 15mins which might have been taken from the orginal movie, this film is very poor. Plot was very predictable, the infected were distant figures and not the fast moving up close rabid fiends from the orginal and the characters motives were superfical and random. Save your brain and sleep instead of watching this movie, your dreams are likely to be scarier!
Martin Barry from Galway , 06 Nov 2007
0 people out of 3 found this review helpful

28 wks later 20 out of 100
1st film 28days later 10/10...tid 4/10
Lynda from Kildare , 04 Nov 2007
1 people out of 2 found this review helpful

Very good but inevitably predictable 30 out of 100
Loved the original. This one is pretty much more of the same, but with a bigger budget. All the actors are excellent and believable, and the opening scenes were Carlyles characters makes the decision to leave his wife to her fate were realistic and disturbing. Sadly the film couldn't maintain this momentum and it settled into a more predictable gore-fest. Well worth a look.
John from Donegal , 02 Nov 2007
1 people out of 4 found this review helpful

28 weeks later 35 out of 100
Good sequel, lots of gore, bit of a no-brainer. Good shots of an eerily empty London again, which was one of the great features of 28 days.
Jimmy from Dublin , 02 Nov 2007
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful

28 weeks later 20 out of 100
my husband really enjoyed this but i'm not so keen!
chris from Limerick , 31 Oct 2007
1 people out of 2 found this review helpful

28 more ways to die by zombies. 35 out of 100
28 more ways to die by zombies.
Jason from Dublin , 30 Oct 2007
0 people out of 1 found this review helpful

28 days later 45 out of 100
Its not often a sequel is better than the first,but here you have it...London never looked better
andrew from Dublin , 30 Oct 2007
2 people out of 2 found this review helpful

A great sequel... 40 out of 100
...with the promise of '28 months later' to follow. Fans of '28 days later' won't be disappointed with this film which has suspense and gore in spades.
Hazel from Dublin , 26 Oct 2007
2 people out of 2 found this review helpful

Good Horror 35 out of 100
Decent sequel, if you liked the first you'll like this.The suspense is replaced by gore but still above average for the genre.Roll on part 3...
LIAM from Mayo , 17 Oct 2007
0 people out of 1 found this review helpful

More holes than a Polo-Mint factory. 15 out of 100
OK, I'll start by saying I liked '28 Days Later'. It was original in style and the energy of the Infected was very well done. Had a great post-apocolyptic feel to it too. So what's wrong with the sequel? Well, the idea is good, but that's about it. Visually similar but the camera leaps about even more and makes any of the actions scenes un-intelligible. But it's the gaping plausability holes that sink it - people doing stupid things, firebombs that don't go round corners etc etc. Just terrible.
Ciaran from Dublin , 08 Oct 2007
3 people out of 5 found this review helpful

28 weeks later 30 out of 100
not bad.. lots of gore.. Definitly makes way for "28 months later"
Eileen from Wexford , 24 Sep 2007
1 people out of 2 found this review helpful

28 Weeks Later 40 out of 100
a brilliant film...one of the few Zombie films out there that actually grabs you and pulls you through the 90mins of the film at a frantic pace!
Michael from Dublin , 23 Sep 2007
1 people out of 1 found this review helpful

not bad 35 out of 100
This movie doesnt have a patch on the original but there is still some good scenes and action to keep you interested.Robert Carlyle is brilliant in this.Gore fans will love it.
gerard from Dublin , 20 Sep 2007
1 people out of 1 found this review helpful

Good Film 30 out of 100
Ok film, good action, bit gorey in parts
Claire from Dublin , 16 Sep 2007
1 people out of 4 found this review helpful



Members also rented..
View DVD '28 Days Later' 28 Days Later
View DVD '30 Days of Night' 30 Days of Night
View DVD '300' 300
View DVD 'An Inconvenient Truth' An Inconvenient Truth

Information

Contact  |   About us  |   FAQ's

Use of the online rental service and this Website constitutes acceptance of our eircom movie club
Terms and Conditions.

© Powered by Screenclick, Inc. All rights reserved.

eircom Limited. Private Company Limited by Shares. Registered in Dublin. Registration Number 98789.
Registered Office 1 Heuston South Quarter, St. John's Road, Dublin 8.

© 2010 eircom. All rights reserved.